The sponsored posts should go for far more than the $3 CPMs on display. They’re taking a premium form of advertising and using it as an add-on, when they should be upselling it. (And there’s no inventory for sponsored posts.)
And in that email exchange, there’s no upselling, just throwing it in for free.
What’s more: this lead CAME to them! Why are you throwing in fries and a drink when the client is clearly willing to pay full price for the stand alone product? I’d understand if this was an effort to build a portfolio of executions for a new product or something… but the “sponsored post” is pretty old hat for Gawker Media, and the “client” is already starting at the 25k line!
What Ryan Brown said.
Off-topic: I see the jargon-heavy discussion above, and realize this: All lines of business, technical or artistic or...
Classic sales rule; Don’t sell what has already been sold. No need to throw in the sponsored posts, that is how you...
I agree with you that custom programs are critical at this point. Value-add is simply a tactic. It’s a tactic because...
I totally agree. But I haven’t noticed any disparities between re-ups from clients that are getting traditional...
That’s how you change the game.
Because the rebuy is better than the buy. Because you want clients who get real value and keep coming back. That’s how...
What’s more: this lead CAME...client is clearly willing
Interesting thing here isn’t the scam, but the bits of Gawker ad sales intel in the exchange with Del. (For bonus...
Loading posts...